Tidal Just Cut Off Royalties for AI-Generated Music. It’s the Most Aggressive Platform Policy Yet.
Tidal published a formal AI policy on Monday (June 29) that immediately strips fully AI-generated music of its ability to earn royalties on the platform, makes it ineligible for direct-to-fan sales, and beginning July 15, tags every track it identifies as 100% AI-generated with a visible “AI” badge so listeners can see exactly what they are hearing. The Block-owned streaming service will also use automated tools to remove AI-generated music that impersonates artists or is linked to fraud. Tidal is not banning AI music outright: the policy explicitly states the platform “will accept AI-generated music,” but it will not pay out on anything it determines to be wholly synthetic. “TIDAL’s priority is ensuring royalties go to original works directly produced, written, and performed by people,” the company stated. “We will therefore not knowingly attribute royalties to music we identify as wholly AI-generated.”
The demonetization mechanism is what separates Tidal’s policy from everything the rest of the industry has done so far. Deezer built platform-level detection technology and has been tagging and blocking AI-generated tracks from recommendations since June 2025, but does not explicitly demonetize content it identifies as synthetic. Spotify launched an AI Credits beta in April that relies on voluntary artist disclosure through labels and distributors, meaning it only surfaces AI use when the creator chooses to flag it. Apple Music’s Transparency Tags system similarly depends on self-reporting. Qobuz announced its own detection system in February and removes AI-generated content from recommendations, but has not published a formal royalty policy. Tidal is the first major streaming platform to make demonetization the primary enforcement tool, targeting the financial incentive that drives the flood of synthetic uploads rather than simply labeling or hiding the content after it arrives.
Tony Gervino, Tidal’s Executive Vice President and Editor-in-Chief, framed the policy as a direct response to what is already happening in the platform’s upload queue. “Our inboxes, and your world, we’re assuming, are inundated with music that is created completely AI-generated and impersonating existing artists purely for financial gain,” he wrote. “Regardless of what you are reading elsewhere, AI’s takeover of the music industry isn’t inevitable if we take even greater steps now to monitor and control it.” The policy covers Tidal’s full catalog including its Tidal Upload tool for independent artists, which means AI-generated tracks uploaded directly by indie creators face the same demonetization and tagging standards as major label content. Tidal describes the policy as “a living document” it will update as detection methods and licensing models evolve.
Related Stories
One of the most significant provisions in the policy is the demand Tidal is placing on distributors. “We expect, and will begin to enforce, that content distributors identify AI-generated content before it reaches our platform,” the company stated. That is a meaningful escalation: rather than accepting all uploads and scanning after the fact, Tidal is signaling it will hold distributors accountable for the content they deliver. Believe and TuneCore adopted a similar upstream enforcement model earlier this year when they announced they were blocking AI tracks made on unlicensed platforms like Suno from distribution entirely, and Deezer publicly called on DSPs to deploy detection tools rather than wait for platform-level discovery. Tidal’s enforcement language suggests it is prepared to act against distributors who fail to meet the standard.
The policy also includes a forward-looking provision that no other streaming platform has committed to publicly: Tidal stated that as its AI detection methods improve, it will expand the “AI” tag beyond 100% synthetic tracks to content that is “substantially” AI-generated. That is a significant commitment because the hardest enforcement problem in AI music is not identifying fully machine-generated content but identifying the hybrid productions where AI tools were used at one or more stages of the creative process. Tidal’s willingness to extend tagging to substantially AI-generated content as detection technology improves puts it ahead of Deezer, whose anti-AI filter currently works only on 100% AI tracks. Whether Tidal can deliver on that commitment depends entirely on the state of detection technology, which remains genuinely difficult for hybrid content, but the public commitment matters as a statement of intent. ShopMerchGame
Tidal acknowledged the ongoing industry debate about whether AI-generated music built on properly licensed models should eventually earn royalties, but declined to resolve that question in the current policy. “This debate will continue as the technology advances and rightsholders and AI music platforms develop licensing models,” the company said, signaling that the demonetization policy is a floor, not a permanent ceiling. The policy lands as the broader music industry is processing a surge of simultaneous AI-related legal and commercial developments: Suno’s Spark incubator with its “Good Vibes Only” non-disparagement clause, the AFM’s lawsuit against UMG and Warner over session musician exclusion from AI licensing deals, the Google YouTube terms of service argument in the Lyria 3 case, and SZA’s public condemnation of AI training on artists’ music all converging in the same week. Tidal’s policy is the most concrete structural response any streaming platform has offered so far.
Related Stories
Related Stories
Related Stories
Related Stories
FTM Newsletter
Sign Up for the Weekly Flare Newsletter so they news comes to you!