Round Hill Sues Suno and Anthropic for $1 Billion Each and Says It Won’t Settle
On Monday (August 17), Round Hill Music filed two separate copyright infringement lawsuits in the US District Court for the Northern District of California: one against Suno and one against Anthropic, the company behind Claude. Each complaint seeks statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work willfully infringed, with Round Hill stating in both filings that damages could run into “hundreds of millions of dollars and potentially approach or conceivably exceed $1 billion.” Each suit opens with 500 works as a “prioritized representative bellwether” and explicitly states Round Hill plans to amend both cases to cover potentially ten thousand or more compositions and sound recordings. As Variety confirmed, the plaintiffs are Round Hill Music LP and five affiliated funds controlling in whole or in part 14,364 musical compositions and 16,873 sound recordings. The named works include “Iris” by the Goo Goo Dolls, “Total Eclipse of the Heart” by Bonnie Tyler, and “I Got You (I Feel Good)” by James Brown, tracks that alone have accumulated more than six billion streams.
The choice of counsel is the most deliberate signal Round Hill has sent about its intentions. The company retained Richard S. Busch of Adams and Reese LLP, the trial lawyer who won the Blurred Lines case for Marvin Gaye’s estate while at King and Ballow, a verdict that produced $7.4 million in damages and reshaped how music copyright infringement is argued and judged. As The Hollywood Reporter reported, Round Hill chose Busch specifically because it wanted a trial lawyer rather than a settlement negotiator. Both complaints demand a jury trial. “The question in these cases is not complicated,” Busch said in a statement. “Copyrighted works have been used to build multi-billion dollar businesses, and in the case of Anthropic a company now valued at more than a trillion dollars, while the songwriters and publishers who created the foundations of that value have received nothing. There is nothing fair about that use, and we look forward to making our arguments to the Court and in front of a jury.”
Round Hill CEO Josh Gruss was equally unambiguous about the company’s posture going into litigation. “We intend to take these cases to trial and to hold these companies accountable, and we will not accept a resolution that leaves songwriters and artists deprived of their rightful share of compensation,” he said. “We are not against artificial intelligence. We are against the idea that you can build a business worth billions on top of other people’s creative work and pay the creators nothing. Licensing isn’t an obstacle to innovation. It is there to protect the legal owners of the raw material, their property. As an independent music company, we have the freedom and obligation to say that plainly and to act on it.”
Related Stories
The Suno complaint has a structural dimension that sets it apart from other music industry AI cases filed to date. In addition to naming Suno directly, the filing names Israeli data-scraping firm Bright Data Ltd. and its US subsidiary as defendants, alleging that Bright Data supplied the proxy networks and scraping tools that enabled Suno to access music and lyrics from licensed platforms, making it liable for contributory infringement. As Billboard reported, Round Hill puts the Bright Data contribution at $75 million on 500 works at the statutory maximum. A Bright Data spokesperson told Music Business Worldwide the company “provides access to publicly available information on the open internet” and that “access to public web data is legally recognized and well established.” The filing cites the July 2026 404 Media report on Suno’s data breach as the moment Bright Data’s role became publicly known: the leaked Suno source code showed the company using Bright Data proxies to scrape YouTube Music, Deezer, and Genius. The complaint also cites the searchable music datasets published by The Atlantic in June 2026 and Suno’s own admission in the UMG and Sony Massachusetts case that its training data “includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet.”
The Anthropic complaint follows a different evidentiary path but converges on the same conclusion. Round Hill points to the same Atlantic dataset and reproduces what it describes as Claude’s own response when asked to rewrite three of the disputed songs “for a modern audience,” with Claude itself acknowledging the results were “edging past ‘inspired by’” and landing “very close to the originals: same structure, same hooks reused with light rewording, and full sets of verses, choruses, and bridges.” Anthropic already faces a separate copyright lawsuit from music publishers including UMG, Concord, and BMG over the use of song lyrics to train Claude, with a second suit filed in January 2026 covering more than 20,000 songs and seeking over $3 billion. Anthropic’s valuation was set at approximately $965 billion in its most recent primary funding round in May, with subsequent estimates placing it above $1.2 trillion.
Round Hill’s dual filing is the most aggressive independent music publisher action against AI companies to date, and its explicit refusal to settle distinguishes it from the pattern of licensing deals and confidential settlements that have characterized the major label approach. Warner Music Group settled with Suno in November 2025. UMG settled with Udio in October 2025. Suno signed a licensing deal with BMG just last week. Round Hill is choosing the opposite path, specifically because independent music companies have both the freedom and, as Gruss put it, the obligation to force these questions to trial rather than negotiate their way to a private resolution that sets no public precedent.
Related Stories
Related Stories
Related Stories
Related Stories
FTM Newsletter
Sign Up for the Weekly Flare Newsletter so they news comes to you!
